P&H Cetus MV sea kayak, long term test and comparative review.

About the test: paddling conditions and paddlers.
This test took place during the period November 2011 until June 2013. It is based on paddling the P&H Cetus MV for over 1250km in a wide variety of waters off the west coast of Scotland: the Solway, the North Channel, the Clyde, north and south of Ardnamurchan, the Small Isles and the Southern Hebrides. It has been used on open crossings to:

...Ailsa Craig... 

...and Arran and round major tidal headlands such as...

...the Mull of Galloway,...

...the  Mull of Kintyre...

... and Ardnamurchan. It has been tested in winds from force 0 to 6 and on sea conditions including flat water, wind blown chop, tide races moving at up to 22km/hour and...

...on exposed Atlantic surf beaches such as Machrihanish. It has been paddled by about 10 other paddlers weighing from 60 to 104kg, varying between novice to 5* level. The main tester is 1.73m tall, weighs 85kg and has paddled about 19,500 km since 2002. The Cetus MV was paddled alongside and compared with a number of other popular "all round" sea kayaks including P&H Cetus LV, Cetus HV/original, Quest, Quest LV, Rockpool Alaw Bach, GT, Valley Nordkapp LV and Etain 175, Tiderace Xcite and Xplore M and Malin Gometra. We also compared it with the Taran 18 and Taran 16, which are both proving to be more versatile than being just the "record breakers" which some perceive. The majority of paddling was day paddling but the Cetus MV was also used for 21 days of self supporting expeditions:...

...bothying and....

...camping in winter and...

 camping in summer.

Manufacturer’s summary.
Fast paced and responsive and really easy to carve and turn, this is the middle ground for those who want a bit of extra volume but are too light for the original Cetus. Perfect for new comers and experts to launch their adventures, the Cetus MV has superb stability in all conditions and the ability to inspire confidence is remarkable and truly unrivalled by any other sea kayak out there. 

P&H's handcrafted quality is on show here in its finest form. The MV has all the load carrying capabilities of the original Cetus with its two main hatches plus spacious day hatch and deck pod there is plenty of room for all your kit for an overnight stay or longer.

Key features:
Length and 'shallow V-hull'
A fast and efficient kayak that will get you where you want to go in no time at all.

The Swede form design
Widest section is behind the seat creating a very stable and confidence inspiring platform.

Design.
Like its siblings, the Cetus HV and LV, this is a low, sleek kayak which hides its size. The Cetus MV is of Swede form (wide point behind the cockpit) with marked taper and rocker towards the ends. As a result from the cockpit the sculpted foredeck seems narrower than other kayaks. This is a design which promotes speed through the water (despite allowing a broad beam for stability).

The Cetus stern forms a drawn out inbuilt skeg similar to those on the Alaw Bach and Xcite. This gives a long waterline length for speed when the kayak is upright but disengages from the water for manoeuvrability when the kayak is edged (if carrying an appropriate load). Moving forward, the bottom is wide and shallow under the cockpit with a slight V at the keel. 

This runs into a rounder section towards the bow, with no hard chines between the sides and the bottom. In comparison with a similar volume "traditional British style" sea kayak (such as the Nordkapp LV), the Cetus MV's cross section at its widest point is further aft and is wider and shallower. It is longer with more rocker than the Malin Gometra but has a similar waterline length.

Construction, finish, fittings and ergonomics.
I have used eight separate 2009/2011 P&H Cetus HV/MV/LV kayaks and my friends have bought four. All have shown a superb quality of finish in respect of lamination and assembly of the hull, deck and bulkheads. The test Cetus MV arrived blemish free but about 4 weeks after it was delivered in November 2011 it developed some slight rippling of the hull sides on either side of the skeg box. This was noticeable only in some angles of light but P&H offered to take it back. However, as I was enjoying it so much (and as it had no impact on performance) I hung on to it. The GRP bulkheads are fitted with a rubber bung with a relief valve to prevent implosion/explosion of hatch covers in extreme temperature conditions. There were no faults in the fitting of components and accessories.

The test Cetus MV kayak had a plain but very smart orange deck and white hull but three of those who have paddled it, have gone on to buy a Cetus in stunning glitter finishes in turquoise or dark blue.

The long keyhole cockpit makes this one of the easiest kayaks to get in and out of, especially if you suffer from hip or knee problems like me. The plastic seat has a removable padded cover and is fitted low in the cockpit and this allowed me (at 85kg) to fit snugly. For those that like to paddle using full hip rotation and do not like seat covers, the seat base is comfortable on its own and supportive, with just the right amount of rise at the front. The seat back was also supportive, not too high for layback rolls and reasonably resistant to folding forward under your bum during rescues/recoveries. Its tension adjusts effectively using a belt and two corrosion resistant D buckles.Smaller paddlers should stick some foam hip pads to the sides of the seat to ensure good contact for edge control. The thigh braces were not so aggressive and supportive as those in the Rockpools and Tideraces but were more pronounced than those in the Nordkapp LV and a bit less so than the Etain. The Quest, Gometra, GT and Xplore M allowed a higher position of the knees, which some may prefer. The Cetus MV thigh braces come fitted with a 3mm layer of closed cell foam. One of the eight Cetus kayaks I have used, lost one of these pads after a few outings. Overall, I found the Cetus MV braces to be a very happy compromise, they allowed a very comfortable range of thigh positions from relaxed cruising to full “brace in a tide race” mode.

The test Cetus MV came with a custom bulkhead and a block of closed cell foam shaped to the bulkhead's profile. I found that the custom bulkhead was suitably reinforced to take the pressure of the toes and I used just a little of the foam to create toe pads. I paddle in UK size 10 boots and despite the fore deck's low profile; there was enough room for daylong comfort. The Cetus MV was fitted with a shorter fore deck pod than the Cetus HV and so my toes could get into the midline in front of it when I wanted to stretch my legs (29"/74 cm inside leg) or have a rest. I think if I was ordering a Cetus HV, I would ask for a short pod as fitted to this MV. I would be happy to trade the increased freedom and comfort for the loss of pod space. The short pod is still capable of holding a small VHF radio, sun tan lotion, head torch, energy bar etc. One of the test paddler's with 76cm inside leg and UK size 14 boots found the MV too restrictive to use all day and went on to buy the HV version.

The footrests fitted as standard are adjustable with large and comfortable plastic pedals. They slide on a track and are locked by twisting “paddles” which come back to just behind your knees. A 90 degree twist (while you are still seated) allows the footrest to be slid forward or back with your toes for a perfect fit. Some people have reported that a previous version (in which the paddle rod is attached to the footrest and pushes it back and forward) can give way under pressure. I found this version remained firmly in place in all seven Cetus kayaks I tried with them.

End toggles (secured by elastics), deck lines and elastics, Silva 70p compass recess and security/tow line bar were of the usual high P&H standard. Behind the cockpit there is a transverse deck recess designed to take a paddle shaft while launching and landing. Personally, I like to keep my nice carbon fibre paddles well out of the way of my bum and the beach. However, there is no doubt that the moulding adds to deck rigidity and due to joint problems I do like to sit on the rear deck before getting my legs in and out of the cockpit. In comparison, the flat rear deck of the GT was very flexible and I did not like to put my weight fully on it.

A large rubber Kayak-Sport oval rear deck hatch was partnered by a smaller round one towards the bow. Little moulded drainage channels in the deck extended out from the hatch rims reducing pooling of water. The day hatch and fore hatch were lighter covers with plastic centres. All covers were tethered. Tent poles need to be removed from a tent bag to bend it through the round forward hatch. The oval front hatches in the Valley Etain 175 and Nordkapp LV made it easier to load long objects. In five previous P&H Cetus kayaks I tried, all compartments remained dry. In terms of carrying capacity, the Cetus MV with standard bulkheads carries gear and supplies for a week's self supported expedition. (It is about the same volume as a Nordkapp LV.) The relatively narrow fore deck together with its sculpted shape means it is easy to get the paddle entry well forward and close to the hull for efficient paddling. The decals are quality items and not cheap transfers. They are 3D items and I particularly liked the bow logo, which looks like an eye.

The test Cetus MV was fitted with a prototype of the second generation skeg slider that is now fitted to all P&H sea kayaks. The skeg system is an ingenious slider on a ratchet that pulls the skeg up, and holds it up, against a shock cord that pulls the skeg down. Unlike some of the first generation sliders, this new one has remained light and positive and very easy to operate. After 5 months the skeg slider box came out the hull. There had been very little adhesive holding it in. I sent photos to P&H who have amended instructions to their fitters on production kayaks. I have used the mark 2 skeg slider in the Aries and retrofitted one to my Delphin. I have had no trouble with any of these. The slider is intuitive to use as you pull the quick release lever back as you pull the whole slider back to put the skeg down. My one small gripe occurs in winter when wearing pogies. Sometimes the pogie brushes against the quick release on the front of the slider allowing the slider to slip back and drop the skeg. P&H have told me that production versions of the 2nd generation slider have a stronger spring to resist this.

Because some previous skeg sliders were stiff , P&H have been supplying their recent sea kayaks with a very lightweight 2mm downhaul elastic in the skeg box. They also recommend setting the skeg up so that there is almost zero tension in the elastic when the skeg is fully down. I have discovered that even with the new slider, the Cetus MV skeg sometimes does not go fully down when you start paddling downwind in force 4 to 5 conditions (or when kayak sailing at speed, it retracts). After you pull the slider back, you end up with a loop of blue cord sticking out behind it. It does not seem that the downhaul elastic is strong enough when there is sideways water pressure on the skeg. When at sea you can relieve the pressure on the skeg and get it to go fully down by rocking your pelvis from side to side. Since the Mark 2 skeg slider moves so easily with little friction, I have fixed this problem by replacing the downhaul elastic with a heavier grade of 3mm shock cord. The slider still has a light action but the skeg now goes fully down every time. P&H now recommend storing the kayak with the skeg down to avoid stretching the elastic they also advise replacing the elastic each year. This is easy to do.

Stability and rolling.
I found the primary stability of the Cetus MV on flat water to be exceptional, only slightly less than that of the Cetus HV. It is significantly more stable at rest than the Nordkapp LV and Taran 16 and a little more stable than the Alaw Bach and Xcite. In practical terms, I can do a cowboy re-entry into the Cetus MV but not into the Nordkapp LV.

Once moving in the confused waters round a headland the Cetus MV and Nordkapp LV both gave a significantly easier ride than the others, especially the Quest, Etain 175, Xplore M and GT, which are all bigger volume kayaks. I think that this is because the volume in the Cetus MV and Nordkapp LV is concentrated towards the cockpit. In comparison the Etain 175, Alaw Bach, GT and Xcite are more parallel sided with more volume towards the ends. However, the wonderful rough water stability of the Nordkapp LV works only while you are actively paddling.

In contrast, the Cetus MV has allowed me to take photos with a DSLR in rougher water than in any other kayak I have paddled. (It also scored highly for camera work because it is so quick to turn and change viewpoints.) It is quite simply the best kayak I have ever been in for photography.

The Cetus MV is easy to roll and the rear cockpit rim and relatively low rear deck allow back deck rolls. Once back up it settles in the upright position very securely. However there is a definite "notch" felt when you apply turning pressure to get the hull turning the right way up. In contrast, the Nordkapp LV rolls up very smoothly (and with less effort) but is much more likely to carry on rolling once you are up and then capsize on the other side After a re-entry roll, with a flooded cockpit, the Cetus MV proved to be more stable than the Quest, Alaw Bach and Nordkapp LV.

Manoeuvrability and tracking.

It only takes a few paddle strokes to realize how much you are going to enjoy paddling this kayak. The slightest lift of a knee and you feel the kayak instantly respond to edge by turning. The Cetus MV feels alive. In comparison the Quest, Valley Etain 175, Xplore M, and Rockpool GT were much more directional. In calm conditions it is possible to do a 360 degree turn in the Cetus MV with a sweep followed by a bow rudder on the other side. At my weight, the Alaw Bach and Xcite (which are also stable on edge) did not turn quite so tightly as the Cetus MV. Although the Nordkapp LV turns very well, it is less easy to hold on edge as the Cetus MV. A real surprise during the testing was how tight the Taran 16 turned with its rudder (though not quite as tight as an edged Cetus MV). We all felt that the Cetus MV's stability and manoeuvrability on edge would make it just as ideal for relative newcomers to learn about edge control as for experts throwing it about in gnarly conditions.#

Having paddled the Cetus LV, MV and HV, I have discovered that the MV is the most manoeuvrable of the three for my weight, when used as a day kayak. When trying a CetusHV/MV/LV, you should choose the smallest size that still allows the waterline to shorten as you edge. A satisfying gurgle from the stern during an edged turn should be a clue that you are in the right kayak.

In moderate wind and water conditions it is easy to maintain a course in the Cetus MV using a little edge or skeg but it does not track so straight as the Quest LV, Etain 175, GT, or Xplore M, without edging or the skeg. In rougher conditions The Cetus MV and the Nordkapp LV are both easier than the other four to paddle into waves at about 45 degrees as their increased manoeuvrability means they are easier to steer round broken water.

Speed
The Cetus MV proved to be very quick to accelerate up to top speed. The Cetus MV, Cetus LV and Nordkapp LV all required fewer strokes to hit their maximum and pulled ahead of most of the other kayaks we paddled. On the same day I found that the Cetus MV, Nordkapp LV, Etain 175 and Xplore M all had a similar maximum sprint speed, which was greater than the Alaw Bach and Xcite. Both of these tended to squat on their tails, increasing drag when paddling hard. However, none of the above kayaks could match the acceleration or top speed of the Taran 16. After paddling the Taran 16, the others all seemed slow. However, at the speed we normally cruise at (6-7km/hr) none of these kayaks would have difficulty keeping up with the others.

Behaviour in wind, waves, surf and tide races

Having such a low profile means that the Cetus MV behaves very well in stronger winds however, it is a wetter kayak in waves than the bigger volume kayaks like the Etain 17.5, GT and Xplore M. The Cetus MV bow rises less over short steep waves than those kayaks and it and the Nordkapp LV do not slam down into the trough like the Taran 16 and other flatter bottomed kayaks. Unloaded, in force 5-6 winds (over sheltered waters in the lee of a low headland) the Cetus MV, Nordkapp LV and Taran 16 could be comfortably paddled into wind and short steep windblown chop at 45 degrees. The Taran 16 was more of a handful but was fast. In these conditions the Alaw Bach, Xcite, Etain 17.5, GT tended to have their bows blown down wind. The Cetus MV and Nordkapp LV were the easiest kayaks to turn, bow through the wind in winds approaching force 6. The Cetus MV can be used without a skeg, as it is so responsive to edging. However, on long windy crossing, I still much prefer to use the skeg and both it and the Nordkapp LV were the easiest to set the right amount of skeg and keep on line when paddling about 30 degrees to about 150 degrees from the wind in force 4 and above.

In small to medium following seas and in surf, the Alaw Bach and Xcite picked the waves up with much less paddler input than any of the other kayaks in this group. However, an experienced paddler could use the acceleration of the Cetus MV, Nordkapp LV and Taran 16 to catch even the most unpromising swells on open water, which the Alaw Bach and Xcite were too slow to catch. Once on the wave, the Cetus MV was steerable by edging, especially if you stayed well up near the crest. It was more manoeuvrable than the Alaw Bach and Xcite on the wave but required more paddler input than these to avoid broaching in surf. However, on one difficult open crossing, with a fast swell from one rear quarter and a gusty force 4 wind from the other rear quarter, the Cetus MV proved much easier to keep on line than the Xcite. The Cetus MV was also very controllable coming in through the surf zone on the approach to a landing. A great deal of this controllability was due to its quick acceleration, allowing you to slow down, let a threatening wave through, then accelerate to catch a more manageable wave, to carry you into the shore. After a broach in surf, the Cetus MV was very stable when braced into the wave, the lack of chines reduced the likelihood of a shoreward flip. The Cetus MV was also one of the easier kayaks to straighten up from a broach. Although not as fast downwind as others in this group, the Malin Gometra was very easy and reassuring to paddle downwind in confused and breaking seas. The Cetus MV was faster as it was easier to catch more waves than the Gometra but it also required more paddler input.

Just looking at its fine bow sections, we wondered whether the Cetus MV might be at risk of pearling (burying its bow) when paddling before steep following seas. However, there is a distinct upward curve in the sheer line from the front hatch forward and on test, pearling was not an issue, loaded or unloaded and with or without a sail. Overall, the Cetus inspired confidence, giving a very smooth passage through difficult, rough water conditions.

Immediately under the Mull of Galloway, on a west going tide, there is a very dramatic eddy line. The main current is moving at 22km/hr and the eddy is moving about 5km/hr the other way. The Cetus MV is the best kayak I have used for breaking out of the main flow into this eddy. It was not possible to swap kayaks on the day due to the lack of landing sites and inability to get back against the current but I have used my Quest LV, Alaw Bach and Nordkapp LV here and the Cetus MV is the easiest and most confidence inspiring. I think it is a combination of its stability and lack of chines that give the paddler the feel of confidence. I kept my expensive digital SLR in my deck bag going round the Mull at full flow(11knots)  in the Cetus MV and HV but in my other three kayaks I have kept it in the day hatch.

Paddling when loaded.

The Cetus MV has a smaller volume than several of the other kayaks I had initially compared it with. On the water and when packing, it feels of similar volume to the Quest LV, Alaw Bach, Nordkapp LV but is surprisingly smaller than Xplore M, Xcite and the Etain 17.5. It is obviously a lot smaller than the Quest, GT and the two Tarans (though the Taran 16 feels and behaves like a much smaller kayak). The Cetus MV with a standard bulkhead position takes the same amount of gear as the Nordkapp LV and Alaw Bach, which I find is enough for a self supporting trip of a week and more than enough for a weekend. However, for personal use I would consider getting one with a strengthened custom bulkhead (£90) positioned to maximise front hatch volume and minimise cockpit volume. This will increase the versatility for camping expeditions. With a custom bulkhead for a 31" inside leg (P&H prefer to allow 2" over your inside leg) the Cetus MV takes considerably more gear, about the same as a standard Quest.

Photo by Ian Johnston Mountain and Sea Scotland

With an 85kg paddler and 35kg gear aboard (see photo above), the Cetus MV is ridiculously stable, both at rest and on edge. It is also much more directional as the built in skeg no longer disengages and shortens the waterline when edged. It and the loaded Nordkapp LV are much less affected by strong winds than any of the other kayaks in this review. For my weight I found the Cetus MV to be the ideal compromise size for day and short expedition paddling. Loading a traditional British style kayak like the Norkapp LV, I tend put an equal weight of gear in the fore and aft compartments, then put my water bag behind the seat. In the Cetus MV I find it paddles better down wind and swell with the gear weight distributed about 60% to the rear.

Performance comparative table.

Don't attempt to add up the columns, I haven't! Each person will rate and weight performance characteristics differently but this might help decide which of these kayaks suits your paddling style and is worth taking for a test paddle.

Long term wear and tear.
The orange test Cetus MV has survived the test and come out gleaming despite hard use and being used by a considerable number of different paddlers. Apart from some light scuffing on the deck and superficial scratching on the underhull there are no signs for concern. There is no evidence of delamination, gel coat cracking or voids under cracked gel coat. The gland where the skeg cable enters the top of the skeg box began to leak after 6 months. P&H offered to take it back to the factory to fix it but I was happy to fix it myself with some Sikaflex sealant. The Mark 2 skeg has remained light and easy to use but I replaced the elastic at 12 months as I noticed the skeg began to lift when planing while paddle sailing.

After prolonged use three Cetus seat backs in our group have folded just above the seat, forming a crease, which is uncomfortable on a long paddle. During a six day paddle my friend Mike cut the bottom of the seat back off, which cured his sore back.

P&H now offer the Connect 30 seat (as fitted to the Delphin and Aries) as an option on the Cetus and I would recommend selecting that as we have had no problems with the Connect 30 seat.

Kayak sailing.

Sea kayak paddle sailing is becoming more popular in the UK, particularly since the recent arrival of the light, simple Flat Earth kayak sails from Australia.

The Cetus MV is one of the best sea kayaks for paddle sailing I have tried. It is stable yet fast and manoeuvrable. The Cetus MV is particularly good downwind and is better upwind than the Nordkapp LV, Quest, Quest LV and the Alaw Bach (which is not as good as the others upwind with a sail). The Cetus MV is not only faster upwind than the others, it also points higher into the wind.

To give some idea of the speed of the Cetus MV downwind with a 0.8sqm Flat Earth sail in force 3-4 winds...

...it easily outstrips a strong paddler in a Taran 18 without a sail. The Cetus MV has the wide point behind the cockpit which encourages planing in less wind than the Nordkapp LV, which has its wide point forward of the cockpit. When planing with a sail in a decent wind in the Cetus MV, it is possible to overtake the waves in front. At these speeds it is worth experimenting with edging. You may find that the turning response to edging is reversed at speed, with the kayak now turning toward the dropped edge. In the Cetus MV this was more noticeable and occurred at lower speeds than in the Nordkapp LV. The Cetus MV is easier to control with a sail than the Taran 16 especially upwind in force 4 and above (though in skilled hands the Taran 16 is probably faster). However, the Taran 16 with a sail is a lethal downwind weapon and leaves even the Cetus MV behind.

Overall the Cetus MV makes a very versatile kayak for paddle sailing. Its stability makes it an ideal platform for those new to sailing but its early planing, speed and manoeuvrability also give it appeal to advanced paddle sailors.

Other kayaks to consider.
If you are considering buying a Cetus MV, you should also try the other day/short expedition kayaks, which we paddled alongside it. The Alaw Bach and Xcite are equally playful on rough water but are more affected by strong winds. The Alaw Bach cockpit is smaller and at my weight I find it just a bit tight for day long comfort. The Quest LV is great downwind but is not as manoeuvrable or stable. The Nordkapp LV is not as comfortable but is an outstanding kayak with a similar range of strengths. It is probably the best kayak of this size in very strong winds and rough water, except it does require more concentration and skill to exploit it. The Xplore M is very comfortable with a good turn of speed but is less playful, being more directional and expedition orientated. A wild card to consider is the Taran 16. Despite being bigger volume and of a very different design to the Cetus MV, it is also surprisingly versatile. It excels downwind in waves but it can still carry a great load. The Etain 175, Quest, GT and Taran 18 are all much bigger than the Cetus MV and should more appropriately be compared with a Cetus HV. The Malin Gometra is a smaller kayak than the Cetus MV but has a similar waterline length. It is not as fast as the Cetus MV downwind but gives a very predictable and safe ride.

Conclusion

The Cetus MV has proved to be the most versatile day/short expedition kayak that I have tried. Its outstanding features are comfort, stability, speed, manoeuvrability, rough water handling and behaviour in strong winds. Lighter or heavier paddlers can get similar performance from the Cetus LV or HV. The beauty of the Cetus family is that they excel both on day trips and when loaded on expedition. I (like many of my enthusiastic sea kayaking friends) ended up buying two sea kayaks: one for day use and one for expeditions. With the introduction of the Cetus family, this is no longer necessary. I have now sold my Quest and my daughter has inherited my much loved Nordkapp LV. I have bought a Cetus MV to replace them both!

Specifications

Weight (standard construction, custom bulkhead, optional keel strip, compass, inc. hatch covers): 27.9kg, length: 541cm, width: 54.5 cm, cockpit length: 80cm, breadth: 41.5cm, internal height at front of cockpit: 30.5cm, rear of seat base to inside edge of front of cockpit rim: 70.5cm, price (standard specification): £2349.

Conflict of interest statement.
During the period of testing of the Cetus MV, I have had free loans of  P&H, Valley, Rockpool and Malin sea kayaks.

An earlier and edited version of this test appeared in Ocean Paddler magazine issue 34. This is the response from P&H sea kayaks (who I have found to be very attentive to any issues I have identified since I started testing their kayaks in the spring of 2009):

Manufacturer’s response
"Thank you for such a thorough and measured review; we really appreciate the time and effort you take to fairly test our products. We are pleased that you have been able to use the Cetus MV in such a broad range of conditions and have managed to spend some quality expedition time in it. With regard to the rippling mentioned, without actually seeing the boat it is hard to determine what has caused this. We are looking into it however and, as always, are more than happy to assess any P&H boat that a customer has concerns over. We are really pleased with the new second-generation skeg system and thank Douglas as well as P&H Team Paddlers for their part in testing this; we have addressed and resolved all the issues around the spring, cord and elastic. We are constantly looking for ways to improve our boats, the fittings, construction and our service, so we appreciate all customer feedback. If you have comments you would like to share with us please send them to info@phseakayaks.com".

Malin Gometra sea kayak long term test and comparative review.

There are so many great articles in Ocean Paddler magazine #38 that there was no room for the comparative performance table from the Malin Gometra sea kayak test. For those that thought one paragraph on the Gometra's performance was a bit short for an OP long term test, I attach the full table below.

About the test: paddling conditions and paddlers.

This test took place during the period February until May 2013. It is based on paddling the Malin Gometra for over 340 km in a wide variety of waters off the west coast of Scotland: the Solway, the Clyde, north and south of Ardnamurchan and the Inner Hebrides. 

It has been used on open crossings and on exposed coasts and headlands. It has been tested in winds from force 0 to 5, in flat water, windblown chop, tide races moving at up to 12km/hour and in swell and surf on exposed Atlantic coasts and beaches. 

It has been paddled by six other paddlers weighing from 60 to 94kg, varying between novice and 5* level. The main tester is 1.73m tall, weighs 85kg and has paddled about 18,000 km since 2002. The Malin Gometra was paddled alongside and compared with a number of other popular "all round" sea kayaks including P&H Cetus MV, Cetus HV, Quest, Quest LV, Rockpool Alaw Bach, Tiderace Xcite and Valley Nordkapp LV. The majority of paddling was winter day paddling but the Gometra was also used for a 4 day camping trip.

Manufacturer's Summary
The Malin Gometra sea kayak - a great expedition sea touring kayak with a huge carrying capacity, which responds equally as well when used as a day kayak . Being shorter than its bigger brother, the Ulva it is much more manoeuvrable. The large hinged hatches make it so easy to pack and unpack the kayak. This kayak is very easy to roll whilst still being extremely stable. You can't help but be impressed by the beautiful lines of the Gometra. Have a paddle in it. You will not be disappointed.

Design.

I first saw the Malin Gometra at the Perth canoe show in 2012. I was very impressed by the finish and original features in the design. The first thing I noticed about the profile of the Gometra was its beautiful sweeping "S" curves at the bow and stern. These allow a very natural handhold, which makes carrying a loaded kayak much easier. 

The second thing I noticed was an almost straight rocker line throughout a significant proportion of the keel. I assumed correctly that this would give great tracking but assumed wrongly that this would limit turning ability. 

In plan view, the wide point is just in front of the paddlers hips. 

The under hull has a shallow V leading into soft chines, which wash out into increasingly rounded sections towards the bow and stern. 

The deck has a very clean look due to the colour matched, flush GRP hatch covers. The Gometra is a relatively short 518cm but due to the long, straight rocker its waterline length is similar to longer, more rockered kayaks. This makes it faster than its length might suggest. At 56cm wide, it is the same width as the Quest/Quest LV but 3cm wider than the Alaw Bach, Xcite and Nordkapp LV. The Gometra has a forward main hatch and a forward day hatch but there is only one large rear hatch, though it has two hatch covers for ease of access.

Construction, finish, fittings and ergonomics
Although Malin sea kayaks have been building sea kayaks for over 35 years they are not mass produced. Each is individually built by Mike Donald and his perfection and attention to detail show. The construction was faultless and the demo Gometra looked particularly well in its white hull with glossy maroon deck. The deck is actually made in three parts and the sections are near invisibly joined at the edges of the main forward and rear hatch covers. The purpose of this is to allow access to the bow and stern during manufacture to ensure that the inside seam is wetted out and fully inserted right into the bow and stern. Only then is the central part of the deck assembled into place. Inside seam problems at the bow and stern have been problematic in a significant number of European and Far East mass produced kayaks.

The novel hatch covers are moulded GRP and are hinged at one end. They sit on rubber gaskets and are secured, opposite the hinges, by folding levers which operate rubber swell latches. These are backed up on the two main hatches by twin adjustable straps with buckles. The hatch covers proved very easy to open and close even in icy conditions (unlike the Valley hatch covers, which are notoriously awkward). Despite being used in a variety of places, with sand grains from coarse to fine, the hatches remained totally waterproof even after extended rolling sessions. Being flush, the covers don't send up spray when waves are breaking along the deck. 

 The electric pump battery box is accessed through the central rear day hatch.

Looking forward from the main rear hatch towards the rear day hatch.

The single large rear compartment, with two hatches, proved very space efficient and easy to load. However, the central rear day hatch does give access to the whole space and so care should be taken opening it if conditions on the water are rough. Some may argue a three bulkhead design is safer if a kayak gets holed but this does not concern me as I always use buoyancy bags, if I am paddling unloaded. 

The deck lines are larger diameter than most other manufacturers' lines and are easy to hold. They are retained by very neat colour matched, moulded in, deck fittings. The standard deck elastics were too thin and map case and pump were washed out by surf. You can specify thicker elastics. 

There are deck recesses behind the cockpit to fit the spare paddle blades while the shafts run forward in recesses on either side of the cockpit. This keeps the splits really flush yet readily to hand. They do not block access to either of the rear hatches. The deck recesses are designed specifically for these splits. The paddles are more than adequate for emergency use, having carbon shafts and GRP blades. At first I was doubtful about this arrangement but by the end of the test I was even leaving them stowed on deck while the kayak was on the car roof rack. The convenience of always having the spare paddles to hand but never finding them in the way made me really appreciate this original design feature. There is no moulded recess for a compass on the fore deck but there are moulded flats for towing fairlead and cleat on the rear deck.

The Gometra has a very large, stiff and effective skeg, which is easily operated by a non kink wire system. The tube that the skeg wire runs in has an ingenious T piece inside the cockpit, which allows silicone lubricant to be sprayed in without disassembling the skeg system. 

The rear bulkhead is curved to make room for water bags behind the seat and the demo boat had a very neatly installed electric pump here. There is a recess in the deck behind the cockpit that protects the rubber covered pump switch. The pump proved highly effective. 

 The very neat pump outlet plug is typical of the attention to detail by Malin kayaks.

It means there is no need for a one way valve which would reduce pump output.

The demo boat was supplied with Sea-Lect Designs plastic footrests with easily adjustable wands but many Malin customers choose a custom bulkhead. 

The foam seat sits on a yellow GRP hanger which can be moved forward or back on the vertical cockpit sides. We were not aware of this feature during testing and some of the longer legged paddlers wished they could have moved the seat back. There is space between the cockpit sides and the hull for storing sponges etc. On the demo boat the seat hanger was rather narrow (fore and aft) and our bum could feel the edge through the thin part of the foam seat. We cured it by putting a little sleeping mat foam under the seat but Malin have since widened the hanger. Our three biggest paddlers had to remove the supplied hip pads to fit in while wearing full winter gear. There is a large knee tube under the forward day hatch. This extends at the back to either side in a T shape and makes the forward day hatch very commodious and useful. However, two of our larger footed paddlers found their toes hit the top of the T when they were jumping in quickly during surf launches. Malin are aware of this and, should you have particularly large feet, they can make the forward day hatch a simple longitudinal tube. The underside of the cockpit coaming was padded and the larger paddlers felt it very comfortable. Smaller thinner paddlers might need a little more padding but all sizes of our paddlers were pleased with an ergonomic seating position that allowed a comfortable bracing position when required and a more relaxed position when cruising.

Performance

The standout feature of the Gometra's performance was its seaworthiness, especially in rough conditions. 

It performed particularly well when paddling downwind in following breaking seas. Despite its load carrying ability and lack of rocker, it proved to be highly manoeuvrable and equally as good as a day boat. Please refer to the table for a detailed comparison of the Gometra with some other kayaks of differing designs but similar intended all round use. Best performance is *****. It is not intended that stars be added as some of the performance features, which we compared, are more important than others and different people will rate the same feature more or less importantly, depending on their experience and paddling style.

Conclusions

It was a real joy to use and paddle the Malin Gometra. This is not a kayak designed by a committee. It is a design that has evolved through 35 years of development of one man's vision. As such, it has some unique and highly practical features. In essence it is a short, manoeuvrable kayak with a remarkable load carrying ability that can accommodate a wide range of paddler sizes. I was particularly impressed by its seaworthiness in testing "big" conditions. Lastly, in these days when almost everything we buy needs to be mass produced in the Far East to meet our expectations of quality and price, it was a real pleasure to be able to talk to the designer about what could be customised for a purchaser and to paddle a kayak built in the UK.

Specifications.
Weight (standard construction, adjustable footrests, electric pump and battery, no keel strip, no compass): 24.5kg, length: 518cm, width: 56 cm, cockpit length: 81cm, breadth: 41.5cm, internal height at front of cockpit: 33cm, rear of seat base to front of cockpit: 61cm (as supplied but seat can adjust backwards).

Campbeltown to Ardrossan via the Mull of Kintyre using a ferry and a portage.

This was a 200km 6 day trip taking the ferry from Ardrossan to Campbeltown then kayaking round the Mull of Kintyre to the surf beaches of Machrihanish and the Hebridean isles of Cara and Gigha before returning to the Clyde by West Loch Tarbert and portaging across the Kintyre peninsula to East Loch Tarbert in the Firth of Clyde. We then returned to Ardrossan via the mouth of Loch Fyne and the Firth of Clyde islands of Inchmarnock, Bute and Little Cumbrae.

Day 1. East coast of Kintyre

Single ticket to Campbeltown please.

A four pointed cross on a two pointed island.

A Bastard of a headwind and a Bloody rock..

An Art Deco landmark in the twilight at the Mull of Kintyre.

Day 2. Mull of Kintyre to Cara.

An early start for the Mull of Kintyre.

All quiet at the End of the World.

It's the Dug's Lugs (if not bollocks) at the Mull of Kintyre!

The Mull of Kintyre west coast... a sailors' graveyard.

Three angry birders of Machrihanish.

Surf's up but coal's run out at Machrihanish Bay.

Kintyre ports not much good in a storm.

Cloud watching on a long crossing to Cara.

The Brownie of Cara; the correct way to greet him.

Cara sunset.

Day 3. Cara and Gigha east coast.

Mistaken location of St Fionnlugh's chapel, Cara?

A tale of goat bhuna, bluebells, albinos and a Brownie.

The Mull of Cara.

The great voyage from Cara to Gigha!

Two lobsters, a crab, a haddock, countless langoustines and a couple of circumnavigations on Gigha.

A postprandial snooze on Gigha.

Baked potatoes at sundown on Cara.

The glory of a Hebridean sunset.

Day 4. Cara and Gigha west coast.

We had a swell time on Cara.

The Mull and mimetoliths of Cara.

The Boathouse, Gigha.

Anchor Rock, Gigha.

Farewell Cara, hello Jura.

The antithesis of headland to headland paddling.

The great quartz vein of Grob Bagh, Gigha.

The heat of a June day on the machair of Gigha.

The landing place of the spectre, Gigha.

The great rock wall of Cnoc Loisgte, Gigha.

Trouble at the mill on Gigha.

Better Days #15, on Gigha

End of a long day on Gigha.

Light my fire, on Gigha.

Living the dream of the Hebridean Isles on Gigha.

We were not alone on Gigha.

Day 5. Gigha to Ardlamont in the Firth of Clyde.

Much toing and froing on the crossing to West Loch Tarbert.

Daisies , shells, pottery and a marble at Dunskeig Bay.

The ferries of West Loch Tarbert.

A fair wind in West Loch Tarbert.

A busy waterway at Kennacraig.

A tale of two islands, one ferry and two captains.

Time for a sharp exit at West Loch Tarbert Pier.

Better Days #16 in West Loch Tarbert.

Tidal planning on an (unarmed) portage from West Loch Tarbert to East Loch Tarbert.

Sea kayaking again in East Loch Tarbert.

Lost buoys and a green ferry in East Loch Tarbert.

Paddle sailing away in the clear air at the end of a long day.

Tired kayakers and concrete sleepers at Kilbride Bay.

Saved by a sundowner in Kilbride Bay.

A peaceful night alone on Ardlamont?

Baked potatoes and bandits in Ardlamont.

Day 6. Ardlamont to Ardrossan via Inchmarnock, Bute and Little Cumbrae.

Between a rock and a contrail on Ardlamont.

Kylie the lonely dolphin: a tale of anthropomorphism and anthropology at Ardlamont and the West Kyle buoy.

Two luncheons, a queen, a saint and a cow on the fair isle of Inchmarnock.

All quiet on the Sound of Bute.

Some fishy goings on in the Sound of Bute.

Dun paddling at Dunagoil.

A turbulent past but all calm now as we made our way past Garroch Head.

The clarity of light and reflected clouds at Little Cumbrae.

A small matter of the Trade Descriptions Act as we set foot on the sands of Ayrshire.

Saved by a sundowner off Ardrossan.

All washed up at Ardrossan South Beach.

All washed up at Ardrossan South Beach.

As we approached Ardrossan on the Ayrshire coast, it was just after low water and we had to drop our sails as we crossed the dangerous reefs of YellowCraigs, Half Tide Rock, Broad Rock,West Crinan Rock and other rocks, which are not even named. We had been travelling fast under sail and hitting a submerged reef in a loaded boat at speed is not funny. Ardrossan is derived from the Gaelic "height of the rocky point" and it is one of the few rocky breaches in the great Ayrshire sand dune system that stretches for over 40 kilometers from Farland Head in the north to the Heads of Ayr in the south. Ardrossan's rocks created a natural harbour on this otherwise exposed coast of shifting sands.

Fortunately there were no ferries entering or leaving the entrance to Ardrossan Harbour, which is marked by a small lighthouse. The light was originally erected in 1850 but was carried away in the great storm of December 1900.  The current light was erected in 1901. In the early 19th century Ardrossan was a major port and shipyard for the rapidly growing city of Glasgow and it was planned to link to Glasgow by canal. The canal was built half way before another scheme involving dredging the River Clyde made it redundant. Over the years the shipyards have closed, ferries have stopped running and the inner harbour has closed as a port and has now been converted to a yacht marina. I do hope the new Caledonian MacBrayne summer ferry to Campbeltown (which we used) is a success.

It is not possible to land and access the ferry car park from within Ardrossan Harbour and so we had originally intended arriving at Ardrossan at high water the following day...

...when it would have been possible to land at this beach at the south end of the harbour wall, which is only 1m high at this point.

View Larger Map

Due to a change of plan caused by my injured shoulder, we actually arrived at Ardrossan at low tide and so the upper beach was cut off from the sea by vicious exposed reefs. We had no option but to paddle on, out round the end of  Castle Craigs rock. This is a remarkable ribbon of basalt dyke, which stretches half a kilometer out to sea. It arises inland from the volcanic plug on which Ardrossan Castle sits. We were all tired and Mike and Phil tried to find a shortcut through the rocks. I knew there was none but they could not hear my shouts over the offshore wind.

We finally arrived in South Bay Ardrossan some 200 km after setting off from Campbeltown on the far side of the Firth of Clyde.

It had been a wonderful trip, involving the tides of the Mull of Kintyre, the huge surf beaches of Machrihanish, visiting the Hebridean isles of Cara and Gigha then portaging from the Atlantic coast from the head of West Loch Tarbert to East Loch Tarbert in the Firth of Clyde. Finally we crossed the mouth of Loch Fyne and made our way back to Ardrossan via the Firth of Clyde islands of Inchmarnock, Bute and Little Cumbrae. On the way we had seen dolphins, porpoises and otters not to mention birds of every size from puffins to gannets. It was one of the best sea kayaking trips that Jennifer, Mike, Phil and I had ever been on. Perhaps the greatest surprise was just how good the Firth of Clyde section had proved. We had expected it to be an anticlimax after the Atlantic coast but its views and wildlife were superlative.

We finally landed on the sands of Ardrossan South Bay at 20:15. At low tide it is 250m to the concrete ramp to the esplanade. We were grateful to have our kayak trolleys as it was a further 150m to a small carpark, where we left the kayaks and walked the 1 kilometer back to the 24hr ferry car park to recover the cars. Ardrossan is not the sort of place to leave kayaks unguarded late on a Friday evening, so two of us stayed by the kayaks while two went for the cars.

Footnote.

At the end of this trip my shoulder was in agony. I had injured it some six months previously when lifting a kayak unaided off my car roof rack. It was clear that this would be my last long paddle of 2013 and that I needed to see a shoulder surgeon. An MRI arthrogram showed I had completely torn muscles off the humerus and torn the joint capsule. It was expertly surgically repaired by one of my former colleagues at the end of July but I am still off the water two months later. The moral of this story is don't try to lift kayaks on or off car roof racks on your own, get yourself some help or get a Karitek Easy Load Roof Rack instead.